Re: Handling mandatory config file updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 17:32 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 09:31 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > 
> > 1) Tag a fresh config file as %config instead of %config(noreplace) so
> >    that the updated package will at least start but will require
> >    operator intervention to return to previous behavior.  (Assuming
> >    the admin notices the change in behavior.)
> > 
> > 2) Attempt to fix up the configuration in %post and hope I don't
> >    mangle something.
> > 
> > 3) Do nothing and hope the admin notices the error messages when the
> >    daemon restarts.
> 
> 4) Build new package only in devel and mention the change in FC5 release
> notes?

Personally, I'd go for 1) and 4) and whine upstream, asking them to take
backwards compatibility issues better into account between releases.
Also, dunno if there will be release notes for FE.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux