On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:06:48AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 10:14 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:53:40PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 09:20 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > > I don't think there is any in the distro (I think open-office specific > > > > version was removed). > > > You think ... this isn't enough. You should be sure, otherwise in case > > > of serious emergency with libxml, _you_ can't react. > > > > Well if you think not shipping a static lib will help, you're on crack sorry. > Thanks for this "warm" welcome ;) Maybe I'm the one offbase, but to me this is a significant breakage, I think this is one more thing which will just push ISV to only use RHEL and not Fedora Core for development, maybe this is a good thing from a different perspective, but from my viewpoint as an upstream maintainer of widely reused libraries I consider this a big regression. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
