On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 13:28 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > AFAICT, the only reason sqlite is in Core rather than Extras is that rpm > uses it. (rpm doesn't tell me about any other dependencies on an > Everything install.) The package seems to be abandoned, as far as a > maintainer. Is that accurate? Would rpm survive an upgrade of sqlite to > the current version, 3.2.2? I don't think it's going to be too much of an issue, the sqlite rpmdb is not in common use in Fedora - Montavista are using it quite extensively, I've spoken with Mark Hatle there and he hasn't tested yet, jbj seems to have with external so I don't think we should expect any huge suprises. Paul
