Re: incoming: dependency warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 23:52 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 17:43 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> > Is there anyway to register exceptions, - eg for secondary archs such
> > as ppc64 which is all I'm getting build dep failures on?
> 
> We do a ppc64 compose which is expected to work, don't we? We don't ever
> actually _ship_ it but it's still expected to be complete, surely? Why
> are dependency failures expected?

Eg - yaboot is ppc32 only - as OF only supports booting 32bit ELF IIRC. 

ppc64-utils requires yaboot
ppc64-utils in the ppc64 tree has a broken dep

Therefore in the ppc64 only tree which doesn't have any biarch magic
ppc64-utils will always be seen as broken.

Paul


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux