Re: incoming: dependency warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: incoming: dependency warnings
From: Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:33:23 -0400
In-reply-to: <20050621173000.GA9969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050621170058.GA9231@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1119374751.24920.20.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050621173000.GA9969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>, List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 6/21/05, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> With this change, general 'these deps are broken' notes should be in
> the normal rawhide mail.


Now to see how many people actually read those reports....

-jef

References:
- incoming: dependency warnings
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: incoming: dependency warnings
  - From: seth vidal
- Re: incoming: dependency warnings
  - From: Bill Nottingham

Prev by Date: Re: incoming: dependency warnings
Next by Date: Re: The recent redhat-rpm-config change and you
Previous by thread: Re: incoming: dependency warnings
Next by thread: Re: incoming: dependency warnings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux