Re: The recent redhat-rpm-config change and you

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:56:13PM -0700, Shahms King wrote:
> Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> 
> | If your package's %files list doesn't mention these files, you'll need
> | to update it to get the package to build successfully without tripping
> | the unpackaged-files-in-buildroot sanity check.  The procedure is
> | similar to what we all needed to do when we started compressing man
> | pages by default, tedious but simple: either change every instance of
> | ".py" to ".py*", or add the .pyc and .pyo files to the %files list
> | individually.
> 
> Should we start including .pyo files, rather than %ghost'ing them?

Given that the change was made to fix #129025 [1], and %ghost'ing .pyo
files would bypass the fix, I'd say yes.

Nalin

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129025


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux