Re: mismatch of versions between arches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 13:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2005 06:02:18 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> 
> > > kphone
> > > ktrack
> > > libosip2
> > > pam_mysql
> > 
> > Interesting. The PPC packages are exactly 1 release behind the i386 and
> > x86_64 packages. Any possible explanations?
> 
> "rpm -qpi" is your friend. It should show that these ppc builds come from
> a different build host when the Fedora Extras build system did only
> support i386 and x86_64.

In that case would anyone take issue with me requesting builds of the
current CVS for these 4 packages as well as python-amara, python-
HTMLgen, and repoml?

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux