Oliver Falk wrote : > > That's what Epoch was made for. > > OK, so I'll use Epoch for this (well, allready did :-) ). Argh. Please try to not introduce any unnecessary initial epochs into Fedora Extras packages! > > The ideal solution would be > > if the previous package had been 0.84-1-rc2, then the new > > package could be 0.84-2. Oh well. > > I'll remind myself about this as soon as I have 0.85 rc1 or somethin' like > that. :-) It's all explained here : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines Obviously, one could consider "it's too late", but if the package with version "0.84rc2" wasn't too widespread, I'd really suggest you don't use epoch and live with the minor breakage that the non-upgradability (until 0.85 something is released, that is) will cause. And yes, I'm saying that because "0.82rc2" for version is contrary to the guidelines, and because *I*'m your sponsor for Extras ;-) Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.11-1.14_FC3 Load : 0.85 1.77 1.53
