On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:42 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > I'd think /etc/pki is more practical. Done, the name is chosen and the directory /etc/pki has been added making its appearance in filesystem-2.3.2-1. The recommendation is for each package to create a subdirectory under /etc/pki with its own name. This is the most general solution, its mimics recommendations in much of FHS, packages get their own area and can do whatever they please without impacting anybody else, and its makes it easier to enforce security via permissions, ownership, and SELinux policy. -- John Dennis <jdennis@xxxxxxxxxx>
