On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 04:56 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > You aren't wrong, but who's to say that it's a bad thing? I mean, other > > than it exposing a minor flaw in mach. Which I am working on, btw. > > If you're trying to 'fix it' by building the srpm INSIDE the chroot > please don't. You're just angling for a world of pain. Oh, heck no. You don't even need to actually build the SRPM, you just need to evaluate the spec file. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
