On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:22:35AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 09:11 +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > > I expect this was just a braino on someone's part, it should have been > > Requires not BuildRequires; > > No, it was deliberate. It's there for the purpose of allowing the > package to be built for versions of python other than the primary one, > e.g., python-2.4 under FC3. It most likely won't get much use, but who's > to say a similar problem won't show up in the future? I don't see how this makes any sense; the dependency on a particular python ABI is a property of a *binary* package, not a source package. If you have a package which only builds with python >= 2.4 (is that what you're saying?), surely it should just BR: python >= 2.4 or similar? joe
