On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 11:01 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > seth vidal wrote : > > > I was looking at the orphaned list seeing if there was anything I > > wanted to pickup. I noticed gpa there and was thinking about owning it, > > but I've got a kinda dumb question: > > gpa devel appears to be sluggish atm and 0.7.0 is still the latest > > release. I looked at the package and spec file, it all looks spiffy. So, > > my question is - if it's not moving and not changing, what exactly is it > > I would do to maintain it? :) > > Answer bug reports with "development is slow, wait for the next version, > sorry", bump release and ask for a rebuild for every new FC release... an > that's basically it, right? :-D Right! And besides, if it works and does what it's designed for, why blame anyone for sluggish development...? :) Seth, it'd be cool if you'd (or someone else) pick it up; ever since kgpg started working sanely somewhere at FC2ish time or so, I haven't really used or even launched gpa. FWIW, I've successfully test-built it on FC4test1.
