>>At fedora.us we've had mass-rebuilds for the first or second test release, >>and the dist tag made a release bump unnecessary. > >Right but if you read the packaging guidelines, I'm not sure we're >quite there yet for those bits of infrastructure. > > >>In Fedora Extras, this is the first time we branch in CVS, and we need a >>concept. > >The concept is simple - give a place to start from and to start merging >to. When fc-4 gets finally branched in core cvs then we should branch >fc-4 in extras as well and 'devel' becomes the new location for: > 1. the fedora extras development repository > 2. the new work for fc5 > >Then the FC-4 branch in extras becomes where you merge changes for FC-4 >extras packages to. >FC-3 for FC-3 extras package changes. >etc >etc >etc. > >thats the the structure that I think was intended. So extras matches >how core is developed. > >does that make sense to you? >-sv Sorry for that being html-mail - the workaround to a composer bug in evo is to write in html-mode then swap it back to text-mode when you finish. I forgot to do that. -sv
