On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:59:55AM +0100, Silvia Sánchez wrote: > I think one of the differences to explain is how the updates and upgrades > work. Ubuntu has a strict schedule compared to Debian (its mother distro) > and Fedora. They have LTS (Fedora doesn't) and "normal" upgrades. > I've seen many people getting confused with this, often understanding that > Fedora is unstable because it has no LTS. Maybe we could explain how > Fedora updates work and why this doesn't mean that is unstable, but just > things have organised in a different way? I'm actually working on some messaging documents about LTS and rolling releases. I think the above is a good topic, but for this article I'm thinking more about practical tools differences rather than strutural differences like that. Make sense? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
