On 02/25/2017 01:18 AM, Eduard Lucena wrote: > Well, almost every page, blog and or magazine, have an article about text > editors, and even when is probable that I will repeat some of their work, I > want to focus this not just in highligth the features, but really compare > them in terms of performance, memory usage. One comment I like to hear > about it is: Where is the line that divide text editors from IDEs? > > I will split the article in 2 main sections: > > > - CLI text editors > - Vi/Vim > - Nano > - emacs > - Jed Editor > - The nice editor (ne) > - mcedit > > > > - GUI text editors > - gVim > - Atom > - Sublime Text > - gedit > - Kate/Kwrite > - Geany > - Bluefish > - The Code Editor > - Scribes > - Nedit > - Tea > - jEdit > - Leaf Pad > - Lime Text > - SciTE > > > If I'm missing one, please add it (if you add a link, better). > > I hope you like the idea, and understand that this will require some time > to be finished. > Hi, it might be also worth mentioning the neovim project and neovim-qt as its GUI counterpart. I've been using it for months without any problem and both of them are available in Copr repositories. Neovim: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/dperson/neovim/ Neovim-qt: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/msehnout/Neovim-qt/ Regards, -- Martin Sehnoutka | Associate Software Engineer PGP: 5FD64AF5 UTC+1 (CET) RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
