On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 12:55 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi. > > I'd like to package gl2ps (http://www.geuz.org/gl2ps/) which is dual-licensed > under GPLv2+ and GL2PSv2+ (http://www.geuz.org/gl2ps/COPYING.GL2PS). May I use > the following License: tag in the spec file? > > License: LGPLv2+ or GLS2PSv2+ So... no. :) The GL2PS license is Free & GPL Compatible, and I've added it to the Good License List as "GL2PS". Even though it specifies a version (and in reference, uses "or later" language), as far as I can tell, only one version of the license exists. If another version exists, we can amend it at that time. Also, is it dual licensed GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+? Assuming LGPLv2+ is correct, it should be: License: LGPLv2+ or GL2PS We really only specify version when there are notable differences in rights or compatibility between different versions of the same license. Thanks, ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
