Richard Fontana sent me an interesting note that I hadn't had time to follow up 'til now. It concerns whether Fedora should prefer the use of the term "License Agreement" over "EULA," the latter of which he felt sounded too much like a proprietary software-ism. And if you think about it, he's right -- what does "end user" mean when any user can potentially redistribute? There *IS* no theoretical end to a Fedora supply chain. I've cc'd him here in case he wants to comment further. I'd like to move/rename the wiki page at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/EULA to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/LicenseAgreement and similarly with the other pages. Fixing the link in firstboot would require fixing all the PO strings as well -- but because the content doesn't change, that's a trivial elbow grease exercise. I'll bring that to Mr. Lumens, along with an offer to make the changes, provided (1) people agree with the change, (2) Chris is in agreement, and (3) we get a rel-eng buy-in for this trivial change. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
