On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 11:43 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 07:40 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 09:18 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: > > > The sendmail license (http://www.sendmail.org/ftp/LICENSE) is not > > > currently listed in the "Good licenses" list, nor is it listed on the > > > FSF "list of licenses" page. However, sendmail *is* listed in the FSF > > > directory of free software (http://directory.fsf.org/sendmail.html). > > > > > > Please can the sendmail license be added to the good licenses list? > > > > Believe it or not, this license is still pending review from the FSF > > since the first time you asked. :/ > > Answer: > > Free, and GPL compatible as long as the copyright holder is Eric Allman, > Sendmail Inc, or the University of California. That's an interesting restriction. Is there a story hidden behind it? Nils -- Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
