On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 09:47 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378531 > "Review Request: python-xmltramp - xmltramp is a pythonic API for > working with XML" > > The payload is a single file: > http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/xmltramp/xmltramp-2.17.py > which has this text: > __copyright__ = "(C) 2003-2006 Aaron Swartz. GNU GPL 2." > > Re comment #2 of the review: > "this package should include License text or file. > Ask upstream to release either tarball containing this script and > license or ask > them to put license text in that script. > > It seemed simplest to add an appropriate header text to the script, > so I emailed the upstream author requesting he do this (with proposed > patches; message attached). > > I've not heard back. > > Is this a blocker for inclusion of this code in Fedora, or is the "GNU > GPL 2" text in the script good enough as is? Not a blocker, tag it as License: GPLv2 and put a comment in the spec file about the missing License text. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
