On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 07:51 -0800, Dan Smith wrote: > TC> That license seems to strongly imply that the schema files are not > TC> permitted for commercial use, which is something that we do not > TC> permit in Fedora. > > Forgive my legal ignorance, but why does it imply that? They use the phrase "consistent with this purpose", and purpose can be implied to mean "a not-for-profit association of industry members dedicated to promoting enterprise and systems management and interoperability." More than likely, it is simply that the DTMF is non-profit, not that the schema is restricted to non-profit intentions, but since they don't really specify any terms or rights for the schema files, it would be best to be clear. > The DTMF is made up of industry members, but I'll try to get a more > official read on this. If I get an email saying "yes, it's fine", > what else do I need to do to record that for Fedora? That would be sufficient, just toss it in the package as a txt file. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
