Re: CPAL license acceptable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 23:16 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > http://socialtext.com/cpal
> > 
> > There been a number of projects moving to this license especially ones 
> > that prefer stronger attribution. While GPL and others which are 
> > considered Free software licenses have attribution requirements too, 
> > this goes a bit beyond that.
> > 
> > Do we want to send this to FSF to confirm?
> 
> Spot, did you look into this? This isn't a theoretical question. I was 
> looking into packaging some software under this license and would like 
> to know before I put in any effort.

Thanks for the reminder, just sent it off.

~spot

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux