There is no release of LGPLv2, so the short names for LGPL listed on the Licensing page are a bit unclear. Would it be better to use LGPLv2.1, LGPLv2.1+ etc. as opposed to LGPLv2 et. al.? It seems odd to refer to a non-existent license. Thanks, -- Michel Salim _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
