Re: Re: dcraw.c licensing ambiguity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 10:31 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:

> I'm not a lawyer ;-), but the source code provisions in the GPL are a
> bit complicated -- to stay compatible, one would have to formulate
> something compatible to 32 lines of legalese in the GPL license ;-). I
> don't know about your customers, but I think an easy way to stay
> compatible to the GPL would be dual-licensing

Agreed. Dual licensing this code would make things a LOT easier for
Fedora.

~spot

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux