Re: License tag status - 2007/08/29

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Looks good to me, applied in 0.81-1.  Thanks.

Thanks Ville.  There's one issue (that I know of) with the code I
submitted, but it depends on whether or not it's possible to have a
License with nested groups.

Is something like this ever possible:

License: BSD and (MPL or (GPL+ or Artistic))

If it is, the current regex won't split it properly.  If such a
license isn't possible, then there's probably no need to worry about
it (except maybe to flag it as invalid right up front in the tag
check).  If it is, then we'll need to improved the regex a little.

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Experience is not what happens to a man. It is what a man does with
what happens to him.
    -- Aldous Huxley

Attachment: pgprPjhwmckEG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux