Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> Yeah, GFDL+ should be ok.
What about the different license versions?
GDFL+
GDFLv1.1
GDFLv1.1+
GDFLv1.2
GDFLv1.2+
AFAIK, the first version was 1.1. So following what's done with LGPL,
both GDFL and GDFL+ could be removed. It would all be easier if the
short license tag was just GDFL, but if the license is versioned, it
could make a difference in the future[*], so it seems like it'd be
best to use the version numbers from the start.
Of course, I'd be very glad to hear that we don't need to be that
pedantic.
[*] if that weren't true, we'd still be happily using GPL as the
license tag, right? :)
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries of life disappear and
life stands explained.
-- Mark Twain
Attachment:
pgpypQvfJPBFY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
