Just two quick comments: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: [...] > Aladdin Free Public License: > > The Aladdin Free Public License is non-free, thus, not acceptable for > Fedora. The following files are under the AFPL: [...] > texmf-dist/fonts/afm/urw/bookman/ubkri8a.afm > texmf-dist/fonts/afm/urw/bookman/ubkr8a.afm > texmf-dist/fonts/afm/urw/bookman/ubkb8a.afm > texmf-dist/fonts/afm/urw/bookman/ubkbi8a.afm > texmf-dist/fonts/afm/urw/helvetic/uhvri8an.afm > texmf-dist/fonts/afm/urw/helvetic/uhvri8a.afm > texmf-dist/fonts/afm/urw/helvetic/uhvbi8a.afm > texmf-dist/fonts/afm/urw/helvetic/uhvr8an.afm > texmf-dist/fonts/afm/urw/helvetic/uhvb8an.afm These are easy to solve since the URW fonts have also been released under GPL. CTAN:/fonts/urw/base35/afm/ is consistent here. > LPPL with commercial use restriction: > > There is one file which has an additional restriction to the LPPL, > forbidding commercial use without explicit permission from the author. > This almost certainly renders the file non-free, and it is not ok for > Fedora. > > texmf-dist/tex/latex/tools/multicol.sty IMO the 'commercial restriction' is not part of the license but is a moral obligation people are *asked* to follow. cheerio ralf _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
