On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 09:10 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > I don't know if there is a way to solve this, maybe consider standard > specification as special case in Fedora. But I feel the core of the issue > is not a matter of modification, it's rather a branding problem, making > a derivation of the spec is not in the absolute a problem, it's claiming > that it's still the spec (and in this case the result of W3C process and > carrying the stapm of approval after the changes). Wouldn't that requirement > on usage be better addressed with a different mechanism like a trademark > rather than a rather strict 'you cannot modify this text and redistribute it' > which I feel doesn't fully address the point. Indeed. Having wording that says "if you modify, you can't call it a W3C document" is fine, but having wording that says "you cannot modify" is right out. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
