Copying fedora-legal-list (where we should start having more public discussion). On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 14:27 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Hey Tom, > > Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > Eh, I suppose there is no difference. I'll nuke LGPL+ off the list. > > I suppose we'll need to let the few folks that updated their specs to > use LGPL+ then? Here's the list: > > devel/Hermes/Hermes.spec:License: LGPL+ > devel/hunspell-ee/hunspell-ee.spec:License: LGPL+ > devel/hunspell-en/hunspell-en.spec:License: LGPL+ and BSD > devel/hunspell-es/hunspell-es.spec:License: LGPL+ > devel/hunspell-hr/hunspell-hr.spec:License: LGPL+ or SISSL > devel/hunspell-nl/hunspell-nl.spec:License: LGPL+ > devel/hunspell-pl/hunspell-pl.spec:License: LGPL+ or GPL+ or MPLv1.1 > devel/hunspell-sl/hunspell-sl.spec:License: LGPL+ > devel/hunspell-th/hunspell-th.spec:License: LGPL+ > devel/imlib/imlib.spec:License: LGPL+ > devel/p7zip/p7zip.spec:License: LGPLv2 and (LGPL+ or CPL) Yeah. Would you mind emailing these folks, with apologies? > BTW, over 1000 packages now have the proper license tags. That still > leaves a large amount with invalid tags, but I was looking for the > positive point of view for once. :) > > I've been running my little check-licenses.py script each day to > follow the progress. There've been a few changes to the short names > since I started doing this. Are you working with Ville to keep the > changes synced with rpmlint? I'm using the config from rpmlint in my > tests and am wondering if there's an easier way to sync changes than > by doing diffs on the wiki? > > The attached diff attempts to sync up the changes to the short names > on the wiki with the rpmlint config. Perhaps it will be useful to you > or Ville. We've talked about it, and we're going to resync when things quiet down a bit. There are several licenses still out for review at the FSF. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
