Re: New proposed top level FAQ for the defunct FedoraLegacy project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David A. Ranch wrote:

>I would like the mirrorlist to stay if that's possible. Maybe change >it to say that there is no guarantee they are still up and serving FL >repo's. I've already saved a local copy, so it's not really for me, >but someone else might just find it very useful.
Agreed and I also saved a copy too. The problem is.. since little to no effort would be going into polcing the mirrors, this mirror list will probably start to reflect bad information.

Personally.. I'm still hoping that Redhat will re-fund this effort as I think it's very valuable but then again, I doubt they really care that much.

"Refund" assumes that Red Hat was involved in the first place. Other than providing infrastructure services, Fedora Legacy is completely volunteer based. There is already a huge amount of funding on Fedora from Red Hat. Asking for more would require a good business case for it. I doubt you can find one easily.

Rahul

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux