Re: Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:43:24AM -0600, David Eisenstein wrote:
> Does anyone have any comments on how you wish the Legacy Project to approach
> this?  I favor SeaMonkey as a Mozilla replacement, as it covers all
> vulnerabilities in packages that dynamically link to the shared libraries.
> But perhaps there are other ideas.


I think this is the only reasonable choice. Backporting all of the fixes
would be herculean -- for very little gain.


-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux