On 6/9/06, Tim Thome <tthome@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 9, 2006, at 9:11 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 23:53 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> As we approach FC6 Test2, we should make a decision wrt RHL7.3/9 and
>> FC1/2. We've been supporting these releases for a while now, and
>> they've grown pretty long in the tooth, even by Legacy standards.
>> Our
>> lifetime policy would dictate that FC1 should be gone already, and
>> FC2
>> would go when we pick up FC4, so that we're only supporting FC3
>> and FC4.
>> The RHL releases are a different matter.
>>
>
> +1 for killing rhl 7.3, 9, fc1 and fc2 when fc4 comes in.
>
> -sv
There needs to be an end for 7.3, along with Fedora Core Releases 1
and 2, but there are non-hobby people and organizations that need
extended legacy support for RH9.
To be honest.. we have had 0 problems converting servers and desktops
from RHL-9 to RHEL-3. I would say that any site needing RH9 should
look at RHEL-3 {CENTOS/TAO/WHITEBOX/etc} versus legacy.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
