Josh Bressers wrote: >>Matthew Miller wrote: >> >>>On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 02:36:13PM -0500, David Eisenstein wrote: >>> >>> >>>>It mentions a bunch of vulnerabilities (all of which seem to affect >>>>Seamonkey, Thunderbird, and Firefox). After looking at each VU#, it appears >>>>that none of the announcements mention the Mozilla suite. Also, at least as >>>>of last night, none of them mention any CVE #'s. >>> >>> >>>No updates for Firefox for Fedora Core yet, either.... >>> >>><https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194617> >>> >>I heard a rumor the other day that Red Hat Enterprise Linux may be planning >>to replace Mozilla with Seamonkey in their currently-maintained distros. Am >>wondering if there is any truth to this rumor? Also wondering if there is >>anything we in Fedora Legacy can do to help in this process of dealing with >>these critical Mozilla/Firefox/Seamonkey bugs? > > > This is true. We're going with seamonkey in RHEL. I think this current > round of issues is proof as to why this has to happen. Backporting to the > firefox 1.0 branch is nearly impossible given the drastic changes between > versions. > > Right now we're furiously working on backporting patches for the most > critical issues. If you want to help mail Chris Aillon (caillon@redhat) > with your request. He's currently heading up a small group of various > distributors trying to get all this work done. > You are backporting patches then for the most critical issues for Mozilla suite 1.7.13 only, Josh? Or also for Firefox-1.0.8? Regards, David -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
