Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 16:12 -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote:
You can though think it does make sense to change the handling
because
it is EOL, independent of who is touching it. EOL means end of
development
which means end of upgrades, at least to some.
Can we agree to not use the term EOL in this way? I made a huge
mistake
in starting this trend. We really should be looking at 'EOL' as when
_we_ stop touching it.
Maybe the front page of fedoralegacy.org should be changed as well
then. It currently reads: "(...) The goal of The Fedora Legacy
Project is to work with the Linux community to provide security and
critical bug fix errata packages for select End of Life Red Hat Linux
and Fedora Core distributions. (...)"
Nils Breunese.
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
