On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 09:53 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > Currently there are five releases in maintenance mode, aka managed by > fedora legacy. Maybe in the future this will decrease, but somehow > whenever legacy tries to kick out a release some people start crying > and it is kept. But let's assume 3-4 releases on the average in the > future. Lets not assume that. I'm tired of hearing people cry, and releases will get dropped, and a strict adherence to the timeline will be met. It was a mistake of mine to ever extend the life beyond what we set forth. > > I also think that the organisational separation of core vs extras > blurs in legacy mode, as legacy for core is already in a community > driven entity like extras is, so convergence is easier in that > domain. legacy is a community security response team for core and > creating a second for extras doesn't sound right, it's better to > consolidate forces. Because we're in the process of moving our stuff over to Extras like land, so that we could possibly get folded into the Extras version of it, or it could all fall under our name, but for now a separate team is needed. Also if we ever get to the point where all of Fedora lives outside, then the core/extras line is really blurred and then we can really merge the teams. That said, I wouldn't be surprised to see Legacy folks in the Extras team (and hopefully vice versa). -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
