Re: [Updated] [FLSA-2006:186277] Updated sendmail packages fix security issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 12:50 -0400, Adam Gibson wrote:
> One thing I noticed after the latest yum update of sendmail from the 
> previous update is that alternatives is broken for /etc/pam.d/smtp for 
> the sendmail package.  Sendmail used to create /etc/pam.d/smtp.sendmail 
> which alternatives would create a symlink at /etc/pam.d/smtp to 
> eventually point to the current configured smtp pam config 
> (/etc/pam.d/smtp.sendmail for sendmail).
> 

Sendmail on rh73, rh9 and fc1 didn't use alternatives
for /etc/pam.d/smtp. It was a real file. That was the problem with the
first sendmail update we came out with, it used alternatives for that
file and the proper symlink wouldn't get automatically created. In the
latest update, we reverted to the previous functionality of having the
package create a real /etc/pam.d/smtp file.

Marc.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux