Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 16:17 -0600, Mike Klinke wrote:

There is instead an entry in /usr/lib;  "sendmail.sendmail"  which
is linked to /usr/sbin/sendmail.  Also the man pages no longer work
if you type; "man sendmail"  You have to use "man
sendmail.sendmail".


This sounds like the Alternatives system got confused and wasn't making
the links that it was supposed to, as stated in the spec file.  Hrm.


This sounds like what happens when we rush the QA processes...

I've stopped trying to do QA because by the time I download the testing
version, install it, and start testing it, and well before I can submit
a report, the package gets released...  Very frustrating.

Ah, now we get down to the nitty gritty of the desire to hasten
the process of going from a Test state to a Release state. Hopefully,
those who in past have seen no need to maintain a policy of "no package
can move from Test state to Release state unless it has actually gone
through test to prove proper operation" and want to change to one of
"if enough time has lapsed, then even if no verification of proper
operation has taken place, we need to move from Test state to Release
state" can see a little bit of the other side of the fence, now.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux