On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 10:24:12AM -0500, David Eisner wrote: > Eric Rostetter wrote: > >This sounds like what happens when we rush the QA processes... > > Other distros had advance warning about this vulnerability, and hence > more time to apply patches and do testing. Personally I _hugely_ prefer fixed packages with minor packaging imperfections, which BTW can be trivially fixed by whomever is installing them by adding a link or two, then waiting for something which installs without a hitch and have a mail server "owned" in the meantime. Headaches in both cases do not even start to compare. I think that everybody should send Jesse big thanks for preparing new packages on such short notice. "New-and-improved", which create all needed links automatically on an installation, can be issued later. Of course it would help if people experiencing problems would try to identify what went wrong (older 'alternatives' do not work like they should?, some typos in %post scripts?, something else?). Again, look at what 'rpm -q --scripts sendmail' reports and check is something is amiss there, as the first step, if you have seen troubles. Michal -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
