-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 20 March 2006 11:01, Donald Maner wrote: > >>With the release of FC5, I figured I'd start the discussion to gauge the >>amount of support for keeping FC2 updates going. >>As specified in the FAQ, Fedora Legacy will pick it up and maintain it for >>two additional Fedora Core release cycles. >>I believe FC1 still has the following to warrant continued work, what about >>FC2? > > > FC6 Test 2 would be the time in which FC2 would be eligible for the chopping > block. Personally I'd like to see it go unless I get STRONG compelling > arguments to keep it. Legacy is an extender, but not an indefinite one. > Longer life span needs ought to be using RHEL or one of the free rebuilds. > > I'd also entertain pasturing FC1 at the same time. - -1 from me (and I actually do some package QA for FC1). No threat involved, but if FC1 is dropped, I will have no further incentive not to upgrade the only remaining Fedora box I have deployed to Centos. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 tseaver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEIAHU+gerLs4ltQ4RAg/rAJ91Mdm7GTgulFdmu4s06l2ZMrq0HQCfXzeS IEWEc//tqiiChlTYZuO9XkA= =/OCS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
