On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Pekka Savola wrote: > > - rh73 and rh9 is used instead of rhl73 and rhl9 > This may have been typo in the wiki, and these should be rh73 and > rh90 (or rh9), at least that's what all current packages use. 171 bugs with rh90 12 bugs with rh9 8 bugs with rhl "rh73" and "rh90" are our winners Can anyone privileged enough fix it in the wiki? (Or grant me the privs to do it? <g>) > > - impact=xxx is not documented at all > It has no impact on FL ;-/ There is a handful of FL entries using it, e.g. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181014 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184074 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184098 <shrug> --Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ] "Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation." -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
