Re: Documentation question at fedoralegacy.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 12:48 -0500, Matt Temple wrote:
> But looking at the download site, it /looks/ as though the x86_64
> rpms 
> are there.
> (Not so for core 2).  
> 
> Does the site need this updated? 

We're testing a new build system and the by product of that testing is
some x86_64 packages.  We haven't yet started rebuilding all the old
updates to spit out x86_64 packages, just new updates are getting them.
We haven't made any official announcements or updated the pages, we're
still evaluating the build system and the packages it generates.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux