Re: Pruning old vendor update packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 17:57 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> Just to make it clear: I'm referring to old updates that were
> obsoleted during RH's maintenance, e.g. which do not exist on
> redhat.com anymore, because RH ships a newer one in its updates
> folder. Last time I suggested this someone though that I was referring
> to vendor packages that had been superceeded by FL, that's not the
> case!

Please do a new check.  I thought I pruned everything that wasn't on the
RH download site.  I haven't pruned stuff that FL has since replaced, I
kind of wanted to keep what RH left and just add to it.  But I'll take a
look at the list you come up with.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux