Jesse Keating wrote:
When no epoch is present, 0 is assumed. Adding epoch 0 shouldn't break anything. Please try this and test within a chroot?
Not with rh73's version of rpm. Epoch-less packages are the equivalent of Epoch -1 (ie, Epoch: 0 trumps a lack of Epoch).
-- Rex -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
