Hi, > I agree with Jesse and David. It makes no sense to drop FC1 if > there is still user interest (a'la RH73). A lot of people jumped to > FC1 when Redhat changed their business practice (which turned out to > be a very good move for them despite mine and other objections), so > I think it is in FL's interest to support them. > > -Jim P. > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project <fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: notting@xxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 9:41:33 PM > Subject: Re: 8 more days 'til we inherit FC3; are we ready??; FWD: > Fedora Core 3 Status Update > > On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 20:30 -0600, David Eisenstein wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In just a little over a week, we are scheduled to inherit Fedora Core 3. > > I suppose at the same time, we will be dropping Fedora Core 1 (though I > > wish we weren't -- we seem to have a lot more postings of parties > > interested in FC1 than we have interested in FC2, and we get more votes > > and QA testing on FC1 than FC2 in bugzilla). > > > > Are we ready? What do we need to prepare for maintaining FC3? > > A few last minute syncups and maybe touching a config file or two and > we'll be ready. > > At this time I am not prepared to drop FC1. We have a significant user > base that is still supporting us in our FC1 tasks and I will not abandon > them. > > -- > Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) > Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) > GPG Public Key > (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) > > Was I helpful? Let others know: > http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating Just to add my 2 cents, I still use FC1, FC2 and FC3 on various servers and would still like to see FL support for them. Michael. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
