On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Pekka Savola wrote: > Remember, the buglist is at: > http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist.html Thanks for the reminder of of our projects list, and for the work of keeping it up to date. It's a big help! > Also, I propose adding a new keyword 'DEFER', which could be used for > packages for the report is basically a minor security issue, bugfix or > the like. Something which might (or might not) be addressed the next > time we have other reasons to create that particular package, but it > doesn't make sense to roll an update just to fix that and can't be > closed outright as WONTFIX. > > The reason for this is that such bugs can be sorted in a different > category in the buglist, and it might be easier to spot more important > work items. I think this is a fine idea, Pekka. It cannot hurt to try it, for sure. Is it the Status Whiteboard field on Bugzilla that you propose this keyword go into? Or would it go into Bugzilla's keyword field? (<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/describekeywords.cgi>) Another alternative is to create a "tracking" bug in which to list all bugs in this category. However, I don't know if creating a tracking bug would really prove to be helpful or not in the context you are thinking of using it, Pekka. > > This category could include bugs such as: > > 121734 2005-10-31 sec nor ASSI nss_ldap openssl kills pam_ldap with SIGSEGV in err_cmp when authenticating against ldaps:// > 134550 2005-10-31 nor nor NEW kernel Networking does not work on Dell Inspiron 1150 > .... -David -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
