Pekka Savola wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Jim Popovitch wrote:
I doubt this is a problem w/ Pekka's list as he has been very exacting
up until now. With this bug(s) I see the explanation above (separate
bug report, etc), but I don't see any reference to 168420 and 166941
in any of the issues lists.
(Yeah, I update the buglists typically once or twice a day..)
The problem here is that if you use (and I recall you do):
http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-rhl73.html
, the package doesn't show there, because a VERIFY has already been
given for the package on that version (so it doesn't anymore have
'publish-rhl73' tag which the code is looking after).
However, it is listed in:
http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist.html
Yes it is, it is listed like this:
"httpd 2.0 multiple vulnerabilities - CAN-2005-2700, CAN-2005-2728"
I know that my rh73 systems don't have httpd 2.0, so I would
automatically ignore that. I guess the problem is bigger than just not
being able to locate the bugs, the problem is also correctly identifying
the bugs. Pekka I know that you don't produce the Summaries, so please
don't think that I am singling you (or for that matter any one person)
out for criticism.
166941 started out as a bug for many somethings, all of them totally
unrelated to rh73. Even the Summary suggests it has nothing to do with
rh73.
-Jim P.
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
