On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:12 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > With what I have seen "in the field" I would rather have that > enabled. People who care about such things can disable that easily > enough. The problem is with those who expect that things will > happen automagically. > > You can make the corresponding package to spit on stdout prominent > warnings from a %post script; that does not matter in which state > things will be eventually shipped. I'll bring this up to the Fedora Steering Committee and see how they feel about these updates being enabled by default. For Fedora stuff, I now am leaning toward enable by default. I think Michal and others may be right, those who are in the 'know' and don't want our updates can easily disable it. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
