On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:04:38PM +0100, Tom Yates wrote: > On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >fedoralegacy.org does not remove old update packages. These make > 3GB > >for Fedora releases. > > > >Could that be fixed? Mirrors would be grateful, and the use of such > >before-EOL-obsoleted packages is very small. > > i'm sorry to continue the trend of dissenting voices to every sensible > suggestion, but there is one major use of old update packages: they're > invaluable for rollback, in the (hopefully unlikely) event that a > newly-released package breaks something. if the removal of superseded > updates from the mirrors is automated, is there any chance we could always > keep the *two* most recent, not just the most recent? I wasn't suggesting removing anything more than what the vendor (Red Hat) already removed. I wouldn't remove Red Hat's last update if FL issues a newer one. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpBDzrHl4cEr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
