On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:29:45AM -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > Please consider this as only a *suggestion*. The actual decision should > be made by Legacy project leadership and general consensus. > > I think it is confusing and misleading for James to post his update > announcements to Legacy list, even despite the huge explicit disclaimer. > It is not a good precedent as it would be clearly bad to have all 3rd > party packagers with their own repositories post package update > notifications to Legacy list. At the very least this type of mail > causes unnecessary noise, and adds to confusion and loss of focus of the > Legacy package development and support purpose of this list. > > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/repo-coord > I think instead James' repository would be better suited as being part > of an external individually maintained coalition of repositories like > these guys. That's a list for maintainers, not users. E.g. not something you would post announcements of new packages in. But of course James and anyone else doing packaging is welcome to join it, I believe all repos not hosted on redhat.com are on this list. FWIW I don't feel like James is spamming this list. His work is focused around EOL'd releases that have been picked up by Fedora Legacy. The user group he is targeting *is* on this list. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp3GVIwW1bni.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
