On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 10:29 -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > > rh73 has a working gtk2 for gaim-1.x? > > > > Yep, it seems to be working enough for gaim. I did basic testing of it a > while back and nobody has complained about the 3-4 releases so far. > > > > If you can give me details about the perl path for RH73 and RH9, I can > > improve the default gaim.spec. I just never bothered to do so for the > > past year because the upstream perl plugin has been broken and unsable > > for a long time, so nobody would miss it being gone anyway. > > Curiously, people noticed it was missing from rh7.3 and rh9 for a while. > I guess they didn't actually try to use it. :) > > Thanks for the offer. Next time I build gaim for FL, I'll check what I > did to the spec file. > > Marc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey Marc, and all, I have just rebuilt gaim-1.5.0 for FC1 and have a .src.rpm package out there for QA. http://www.fedoralegacy.org/contrib/gaim/gaim-1.5.0-1.fc1.2.legacy.src.rpm 943907fbd013a565e3634b69a1542b2763b13dc7 gaim-1.5.0-1.fc1.2.legacy.src.rpm Are there some special changes that need to be made to spec files for rh7.3 and rh9 so newer gaim packages will work in these environments? If so, would you share those? Thanks! -David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDMdg8xou1V/j9XZwRAhxSAJ0XfqHO6uQaC86W5bpUuxodDpdHSQCgmWZn t7c8RfZCnb56J4jlCpn3NcI= =YsZz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
