-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mike Klinke wrote:
|On Monday 08 August 2005 10:55, JK wrote:
|
|
|><<-- SNIP -->>
|
|
|
|Well, maybe it's just me, but I find that a security fix released
|against a fedora-legacy supported version ( FC1 ) to fix a version
|of a package that was never released to FC1 in the first place and
|that will, presumably, not be able to be upgraded with a future
|release of the package by the fedora-legacy folks to the "real" FC1
|version, should there be one, well, rather confusing.
|
|Perhaps what I'm missing is how this is adding value to
|Fedora-legacy?
|
|
|Regards, Mike Klinke
I don't want to add confusion, just a place to add updates for new
versions of products.
I'll refrane from posting until I straighten this mess out.
James Kosin
|
|--
|
|fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
|http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC96yvkNLDmnu1kSkRAgxZAJsFS0YLPgd+VSSKPZnrRGvfiwdIyACfU62k
AXAbWthK73e2QM7kU82Nt78=
=j4T7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
